↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Is There a Role for Combined EMG-fMRI in Exploring the Pathophysiology of Essential Tremor and Improving Functional Neurosurgery?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Is There a Role for Combined EMG-fMRI in Exploring the Pathophysiology of Essential Tremor and Improving Functional Neurosurgery?
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Fiorella Contarino, Paul F. C. Groot, Johan N. van der Meer, Lo J. Bour, Johannes D. Speelman, Aart J. Nederveen, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Marina A. J. Tijssen, Peter Rick Schuurman, Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar

Abstract

Functional MRI combined with electromyography (EMG-fMRI) is a new technique to investigate the functional association of movement to brain activations. Thalamic stereotactic surgery is effective in reducing tremor. However, while some patients have satisfying benefit, others have only partial or temporary relief. This could be due to suboptimal targeting in some cases. By identifying tremor-related areas, EMG-fMRI could provide more insight into the pathophysiology of tremor and be potentially useful in refining surgical targeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 16 31%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Neuroscience 8 15%
Engineering 5 10%
Psychology 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 21%