↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Determining Biophysical Protein Stability in Lysates by a Fast Proteolysis Assay, FASTpp

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Determining Biophysical Protein Stability in Lysates by a Fast Proteolysis Assay, FASTpp
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046147
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Minde, Madelon M. Maurice, Stefan G. D. Rüdiger

Abstract

The biophysical stability is an important parameter for protein activity both in vivo and in vitro. Here we propose a method to analyse thermal melting of protein domains in lysates: Fast parallel proteolysis (FASTpp). Combining unfolding by a temperature gradient in a thermal cycler with simultaneous proteolytic cleavage of the unfolded state, we probed stability of single domains in lysates. We validated FASTpp on proteins from 10 kDa to 240 kDa and monitored stabilisation and coupled folding and binding upon interaction with small-molecule ligands. Within a total reaction time of approximately 1 min, we probed subtle stability differences of point mutations with high sensitivity and in agreement with data obtained by intrinsic protein fluorescence. We anticipate a wide range of applications of FASTpp in biomedicine and protein engineering as it requires only standard laboratory equipment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Other 6 5%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 30%
Chemistry 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 10 9%