↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Non-Threatening Other-Race Faces Capture Visual Attention: Evidence from a Dot-Probe Task

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Non-Threatening Other-Race Faces Capture Visual Attention: Evidence from a Dot-Probe Task
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shahd Al-Janabi, Colin MacLeod, Gillian Rhodes

Abstract

Visual attentional biases towards other-race faces have been attributed to the perceived threat value of such faces. It is possible, however, that they reflect the relative visual novelty of other-race faces. Here we demonstrate an attentional bias to other-race faces in the absence of perceived threat. White participants rated female East Asian faces as no more threatening than female own-race faces. Nevertheless, using a new dot-probe paradigm that can distinguish attentional capture and hold effects, we found that these other-race faces selectively captured visual attention. Importantly, this demonstration challenges previous interpretations of attentional biases to other-race faces as threat responses. Future studies will need to determine whether perceived threat increases attentional biases to other-race faces, beyond the levels seen here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 63 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 66%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%