↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Half-Octave Shift in Mammalian Hearing Is an Epiphenomenon of the Cochlear Amplifier

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Half-Octave Shift in Mammalian Hearing Is an Epiphenomenon of the Cochlear Amplifier
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sripriya Ramamoorthy, Alfred L. Nuttall

Abstract

The cochlear amplifier is a hypothesized positive feedback process responsible for our exquisite hearing sensitivity. Experimental evidence for or against the positive feedback hypothesis is still lacking. Here we apply linear control theory to determine the open-loop gain and the closed-loop sensitivity of the cochlear amplifier from available measurements of basilar membrane vibration in sensitive mammalian cochleae. We show that the frequency of peak closed-loop sensitivity is independent of the stimulus level and close to the characteristic frequency. This implies that the half-octave shift in mammalian hearing is an epiphenomenon of the cochlear amplifier. The open-loop gain is consistent with positive feedback and suggests that the high-frequency cut-off of the outer hair cell transmembrane potential in vivo may be necessary for cochlear amplification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Belgium 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Psychology 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 36%