↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Meditation Experience Predicts Introspective Accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
Meditation Experience Predicts Introspective Accuracy
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kieran C. R. Fox, Pierre Zakarauskas, Matt Dixon, Melissa Ellamil, Evan Thompson, Kalina Christoff

Abstract

The accuracy of subjective reports, especially those involving introspection of one's own internal processes, remains unclear, and research has demonstrated large individual differences in introspective accuracy. It has been hypothesized that introspective accuracy may be heightened in persons who engage in meditation practices, due to the highly introspective nature of such practices. We undertook a preliminary exploration of this hypothesis, examining introspective accuracy in a cross-section of meditation practitioners (1-15,000 hrs experience). Introspective accuracy was assessed by comparing subjective reports of tactile sensitivity for each of 20 body regions during a 'body-scanning' meditation with averaged, objective measures of tactile sensitivity (mean size of body representation area in primary somatosensory cortex; two-point discrimination threshold) as reported in prior research. Expert meditators showed significantly better introspective accuracy than novices; overall meditation experience also significantly predicted individual introspective accuracy. These results suggest that long-term meditators provide more accurate introspective reports than novices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 272 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 22%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 43 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 113 40%
Neuroscience 29 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Philosophy 8 3%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 58 20%