↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Haptic Search for Hard and Soft Spheres

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Haptic Search for Hard and Soft Spheres
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045298
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vonne van Polanen, Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest, Astrid M. L. Kappers

Abstract

In this study the saliency of hardness and softness were investigated in an active haptic search task. Two experiments were performed to explore these properties in different contexts. In Experiment 1, blindfolded participants had to grasp a bundle of spheres and determine the presence of a hard target among soft distractors or vice versa. If the difference in compliance between target and distractors was small, reaction times increased with the number of items for both features; a serial strategy was found to be used. When the difference in compliance was large, the reaction times were independent of the number of items, indicating a parallel strategy. In Experiment 2, blindfolded participants pressed their hand on a display filled with hard and soft items. In the search for a soft target, increasing reaction times with the number of items were found, but the location of target and distractors appeared to have a large influence on the search difficulty. In the search for a hard target, reaction times did not depend on the number of items. In sum, this showed that both hardness and softness are salient features.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 38%
Engineering 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%