↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Validation and Ranking of Established Staging-Systems in a Large Western HCC-Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Validation and Ranking of Established Staging-Systems in a Large Western HCC-Cohort
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0045066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark op den Winkel, Dorothea Nagel, Julia Sappl, Philip op den Winkel, Rolf Lamerz, Christoph J. Zech, Gundula Straub, Thomas Nickel, Markus Rentsch, Petra Stieber, Burkhard Göke, Frank T. Kolligs

Abstract

HCC is diagnosed in approximately half a million people per year, worldwide. Staging is a more complex issue than in most other cancer entities and, mainly due to unique geographic characteristics of the disease, no universally accepted staging system exists to date. Focusing on survival rates we analyzed demographic, etiological, clinical, laboratory and tumor characteristics of HCC-patients in our institution and applied the common staging systems. Furthermore we aimed at identifying the most suitable of the current staging systems for predicting survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 10 20%