↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Dyslexia Impairs Speech Recognition but Can Spare Phonological Competence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
pinterest
1 Pinner

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Dyslexia Impairs Speech Recognition but Can Spare Phonological Competence
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Berent, Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum, Evan Balaban, Albert M. Galaburda

Abstract

Dyslexia is associated with numerous deficits to speech processing. Accordingly, a large literature asserts that dyslexics manifest a phonological deficit. Few studies, however, have assessed the phonological grammar of dyslexics, and none has distinguished a phonological deficit from a phonetic impairment. Here, we show that these two sources can be dissociated. Three experiments demonstrate that a group of adult dyslexics studied here is impaired in phonetic discrimination (e.g., ba vs. pa), and their deficit compromises even the basic ability to identify acoustic stimuli as human speech. Remarkably, the ability of these individuals to generalize grammatical phonological rules is intact. Like typical readers, these Hebrew-speaking dyslexics identified ill-formed AAB stems (e.g., titug) as less wordlike than well-formed ABB controls (e.g., gitut), and both groups automatically extended this rule to nonspeech stimuli, irrespective of reading ability. The contrast between the phonetic and phonological capacities of these individuals demonstrates that the algebraic engine that generates phonological patterns is distinct from the phonetic interface that implements them. While dyslexia compromises the phonetic system, certain core aspects of the phonological grammar can be spared.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 6%
Netherlands 2 2%
Cuba 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 89 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 43%
Linguistics 13 13%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 12 12%