↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Measuring Ambiguity in HLA Typing Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Ambiguity in HLA Typing Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043585
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanja Paunić, Loren Gragert, Abeer Madbouly, John Freeman, Martin Maiers

Abstract

In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, donor selection is based primarily on matching donor and patient HLA genes. These genes are highly polymorphic and their typing can result in exact allele assignment at each gene (the resolution at which patients and donors are matched), but it can also result in a set of ambiguous assignments, depending on the typing methodology used. To facilitate rapid identification of matched donors, registries employ statistical algorithms to infer HLA alleles from ambiguous genotypes. Linkage disequilibrium information encapsulated in haplotype frequencies is used to facilitate prediction of the most likely haplotype assignment. An HLA typing with less ambiguity produces fewer high-probability haplotypes and a more reliable prediction. We estimated ambiguity for several HLA typing methods across four continental populations using an information theory-based measure, Shannon's entropy. We used allele and haplotype frequencies to calculate entropy for different sets of 1,000 subjects with simulated HLA typing. Using allele frequencies we calculated an average entropy in Caucasians of 1.65 for serology, 1.06 for allele family level, 0.49 for a 2002-era SSO kit, and 0.076 for single-pass SBT. When using haplotype frequencies in entropy calculations, we found average entropies of 0.72 for serology, 0.73 for allele family level, 0.05 for SSO, and 0.002 for single-pass SBT. Application of haplotype frequencies further reduces HLA typing ambiguity. We also estimated expected confirmatory typing mismatch rates for simulated subjects. In a hypothetical registry with all donors typed using the same method, the entropy values based on haplotype frequencies correspond to confirmatory typing mismatch rates of 1.31% for SSO versus only 0.08% for SBT. Intermediate-resolution single-pass SBT contains the least ambiguity of the methods we evaluated and therefore the most certainty in allele prediction. The presented measure objectively evaluates HLA typing methods and can help define acceptable HLA typing for donor recruitment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 19%