↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
53 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Publication Bias in Laboratory Animal Research: A Survey on Magnitude, Drivers, Consequences and Potential Solutions
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerben ter Riet, Daniel A. Korevaar, Marlies Leenaars, Peter J. Sterk, Cornelis J. F. Van Noorden, Lex M. Bouter, René Lutter, Ronald P. Oude Elferink, Lotty Hooft

Abstract

Publication bias jeopardizes evidence-based medicine, mainly through biased literature syntheses. Publication bias may also affect laboratory animal research, but evidence is scarce.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Psychology 9 8%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 29 25%