↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Waist-to-Height Ratio and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Elderly Individuals at High Cardiovascular Risk

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Waist-to-Height Ratio and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Elderly Individuals at High Cardiovascular Risk
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Guasch-Ferré, Mònica Bulló, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Dolores Corella, Ramon Estruch, María-Isabel Covas, Fernando Arós, Julia Wärnberg, Miquel Fiol, José Lapetra, Miguel Ángel Muñoz, Lluís Serra-Majem, Xavier Pintó, Nancy Babio, Andrés Díaz-López, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

Abstract

Several anthropometric measurements have been associated with cardiovascular disease, type-2 diabetes mellitus and other cardiovascular risk conditions, such as hypertension or metabolic syndrome. Waist-to-height-ratio has been proposed as a useful tool for assessing abdominal obesity, correcting other measurements for the height of the individual. We compared the ability of several anthropometric measurements to predict the presence of type-2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, hypertension, atherogenic dyslipidemia or metabolic syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 41 26%