↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Mis-Assembled “Segmental Duplications” in Two Versions of the Bos taurus Genome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mis-Assembled “Segmental Duplications” in Two Versions of the Bos taurus Genome
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksey V. Zimin, David R. Kelley, Michael Roberts, Guillaume Marçais, Steven L. Salzberg, James A. Yorke

Abstract

We analyzed the whole genome sequence coverage in two versions of the Bos taurus genome and identified all regions longer than five kilobases (Kbp) that are duplicated within chromosomes with >99% sequence fidelity in both copies. We call these regions High Fidelity Duplications (HFDs). The two assemblies were Btau 4.2, produced by the Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine, and UMD Bos taurus 3.1 (UMD 3.1), produced by our group at the University of Maryland. We found that Btau 4.2 has a far greater number of HFDs, 3111 versus only 69 in UMD 3.1. Read coverage analysis shows that 39 million base pairs (Mbp) of sequence in HFDs in Btau 4.2 appear to be a result of a mis-assembly and therefore cannot be qualified as segmental duplications. UMD 3.1 has only 0.41 Mbp of sequence in HFDs that are due to a mis-assembly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 5%
Hungary 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Mathematics 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 3 7%