↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
39 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harold Pashler, Noriko Coburn, Christine R. Harris

Abstract

Williams and Bargh (2008) reported an experiment in which participants were simply asked to plot a single pair of points on a piece of graph paper, with the coordinates provided by the experimenter specifying a pair of points that lay at one of three different distances (close, intermediate, or far, relative to the range available on the graph paper). The participants who had graphed a more distant pair reported themselves as being significantly less close to members of their own family than did those who had plotted a more closely-situated pair. In another experiment, people's estimates of the caloric content of different foods were reportedly altered by the same type of spatial distance priming. Direct replications of both results were attempted, with precautions to ensure that the experimenter did not know what condition the participant was assigned to. The results showed no hint of the priming effects reported by Williams and Bargh (2008).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 27%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 11 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 62%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 13 9%