↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Interannual Variability of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Lake Erie

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
Title
Interannual Variability of Cyanobacterial Blooms in Lake Erie
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard P. Stumpf, Timothy T. Wynne, David B. Baker, Gary L. Fahnenstiel

Abstract

After a 20-year absence, severe cyanobacterial blooms have returned to Lake Erie in the last decade, in spite of negligible change in the annual load of total phosphorus (TP). Medium-spectral Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) imagery was used to quantify intensity of the cyanobacterial bloom for each year from 2002 to 2011. The blooms peaked in August or later, yet correlate to discharge (Q) and TP loads only for March through June. The influence of the spring TP load appears to have started in the late 1990 s, after Dreissenid mussels colonized the lake, as hindcasts prior to 1998 are inconsistent with the observed blooms. The total spring Q or TP load appears sufficient to predict bloom magnitude, permitting a seasonal forecast prior to the start of the bloom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 290 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 19%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 99 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 16%
Engineering 27 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 9%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 72 24%