↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Open Source Tracking and Analysis of Adult Drosophila Locomotion in Buridan's Paradigm with and without Visual Targets

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Open Source Tracking and Analysis of Adult Drosophila Locomotion in Buridan's Paradigm with and without Visual Targets
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Colomb, Lutz Reiter, Jedrzej Blaszkiewicz, Jan Wessnitzer, Bjoern Brembs

Abstract

Insects have been among the most widely used model systems for studying the control of locomotion by nervous systems. In Drosophila, we implemented a simple test for locomotion: in Buridan's paradigm, flies walk back and forth between two inaccessible visual targets [1]. Until today, the lack of easily accessible tools for tracking the fly position and analyzing its trajectory has probably contributed to the slow acceptance of Buridan's paradigm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 4%
Portugal 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 141 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 46%
Neuroscience 24 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Computer Science 5 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 28 18%