↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Identification of Learning Mechanisms in a Wild Meerkat Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
Title
Identification of Learning Mechanisms in a Wild Meerkat Population
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Will Hoppitt, Jamie Samson, Kevin N. Laland, Alex Thornton

Abstract

Vigorous debates as to the evolutionary origins of culture remain unresolved due to an absence of methods for identifying learning mechanisms in natural populations. While laboratory experiments on captive animals have revealed evidence for a number of mechanisms, these may not necessarily reflect the processes typically operating in nature. We developed a novel method that allows social and asocial learning mechanisms to be determined in animal groups from the patterns of interaction with, and solving of, a task. We deployed it to analyse learning in groups of wild meerkats (Suricata suricatta) presented with a novel foraging apparatus. We identify nine separate learning processes underlying the meerkats' foraging behaviour, in each case precisely quantifying their strength and duration, including local enhancement, emulation, and a hitherto unrecognized form of social learning, which we term 'observational perseverance'. Our analysis suggests a key factor underlying the stability of behavioural traditions is a high ratio of specific to generalized social learning effects. The approach has widespread potential as an ecologically valid tool to investigate learning mechanisms in natural groups of animals, including humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 213 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 22%
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 35 15%
Other 14 6%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 27 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 56%
Environmental Science 28 12%
Psychology 15 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 37 16%