↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Autophagy Suppresses RIP Kinase-Dependent Necrosis Enabling Survival to mTOR Inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Autophagy Suppresses RIP Kinase-Dependent Necrosis Enabling Survival to mTOR Inhibition
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041831
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Bray, Robin Mathew, Alexandria Lau, Jurre J. Kamphorst, Jing Fan, Jim Chen, Hsin-Yi Chen, Anahita Ghavami, Mark Stein, Robert S. DiPaola, Donna Zhang, Joshua D. Rabinowitz, Eileen White

Abstract

mTOR inhibitors are used clinically to treat renal cancer but are not curative. Here we show that autophagy is a resistance mechanism of human renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines to mTOR inhibitors. RCC cell lines have high basal autophagy that is required for survival to mTOR inhibition. In RCC4 cells, inhibition of mTOR with CCI-779 stimulates autophagy and eliminates RIP kinases (RIPKs) and this is blocked by autophagy inhibition, which induces RIPK- and ROS-dependent necroptosis in vitro and suppresses xenograft growth. Autophagy of mitochondria is required for cell survival since mTOR inhibition turns off Nrf2 antioxidant defense. Thus, coordinate mTOR and autophagy inhibition leads to an imbalance between ROS production and defense, causing necroptosis that may enhance cancer treatment efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 26%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 23 17%