↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Universal Access to HIV Treatment versus Universal ‘Test and Treat’: Transmission, Drug Resistance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Universal Access to HIV Treatment versus Universal ‘Test and Treat’: Transmission, Drug Resistance & Treatment Costs
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley G. Wagner, Sally Blower

Abstract

In South Africa (SA) universal access to treatment for HIV-infected individuals in need has yet to be achieved. Currently ~1 million receive treatment, but an additional 1.6 million are in need. It is being debated whether to use a universal 'test and treat' (T&T) strategy to try to eliminate HIV in SA; treatment reduces infectivity and hence transmission. Under a T&T strategy all HIV-infected individuals would receive treatment whether in need or not. This would require treating 5 million individuals almost immediately and providing treatment for several decades. We use a validated mathematical model to predict impact and costs of: (i) a universal T&T strategy and (ii) achieving universal access to treatment. Using modeling the WHO has predicted a universal T&T strategy in SA would eliminate HIV within a decade, and (after 40 years) cost ~$10 billion less than achieving universal access. In contrast, we predict a universal T&T strategy in SA could eliminate HIV, but take 40 years and cost ~$12 billion more than achieving universal access. We determine the difference in predictions is because the WHO has under-estimated survival time on treatment and ignored the risk of resistance. We predict, after 20 years, ~2 million individuals would need second-line regimens if a universal T&T strategy is implemented versus ~1.5 million if universal access is achieved. Costs need to be realistically estimated and multiple evaluation criteria used to compare 'treatment as prevention' with other prevention strategies. Before implementing a universal T&T strategy, which may not be sustainable, we recommend striving to achieve universal access to treatment as quickly as possible. We predict achieving universal access to treatment would be a very effective 'treatment as prevention' approach and bring the HIV epidemic in SA close to elimination, preventing ~4 million infections after 20 years and ~11 million after 40 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 4 3%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 127 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Professor 8 6%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 29 21%