↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Skin and Bones: The Contribution of Skin Tone and Facial Structure to Racial Prototypicality Ratings

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Skin and Bones: The Contribution of Skin Tone and Facial Structure to Racial Prototypicality Ratings
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Strom, Leslie A. Zebrowitz, Shunan Zhang, P. Matthew Bronstad, Hoon Koo Lee

Abstract

Previous research reveals that a more 'African' appearance has significant social consequences, yielding more negative first impressions and harsher criminal sentencing of Black or White individuals. This study is the first to systematically assess the relative contribution of skin tone and facial metrics to White, Black, and Korean perceivers' ratings of the racial prototypicality of faces from the same three groups. Our results revealed that the relative contribution of metrics and skin tone depended on both perceiver race and face race. White perceivers' racial prototypicality ratings were less responsive to variations in skin tone than were Black or Korean perceivers' ratings. White perceivers ratings' also were more responsive to facial metrics than to skin tone, while the reverse was true for Black perceivers. Additionally, across all perceiver groups, skin tone had a more consistent impact than metrics on racial prototypicality ratings of White faces, with the reverse for Korean faces. For Black faces, the relative impact varied with perceiver race: skin tone had a more consistent impact than metrics for Black and Korean perceivers, with the reverse for White perceivers. These results have significant implications for predicting who will experience racial prototypicality biases and from whom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 16%