↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

TAGCNA: A Method to Identify Significant Consensus Events of Copy Number Alterations in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
TAGCNA: A Method to Identify Significant Consensus Events of Copy Number Alterations in Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiguo Yuan, Junying Zhang, Liying Yang, Shengli Zhang, Baodi Chen, Yaojun Geng, Yue Wang

Abstract

Somatic copy number alteration (CNA) is a common phenomenon in cancer genome. Distinguishing significant consensus events (SCEs) from random background CNAs in a set of subjects has been proven to be a valuable tool to study cancer. In order to identify SCEs with an acceptable type I error rate, better computational approaches should be developed based on reasonable statistics and null distributions. In this article, we propose a new approach named TAGCNA for identifying SCEs in somatic CNAs that may encompass cancer driver genes. TAGCNA employs a peel-off permutation scheme to generate a reasonable null distribution based on a prior step of selecting tag CNA markers from the genome being considered. We demonstrate the statistical power of TAGCNA on simulated ground truth data, and validate its applicability using two publicly available cancer datasets: lung and prostate adenocarcinoma. TAGCNA identifies SCEs that are known to be involved with proto-oncogenes (e.g. EGFR, CDK4) and tumor suppressor genes (e.g. CDKN2A, CDKN2B), and provides many additional SCEs with potential biological relevance in these data. TAGCNA can be used to analyze the significance of CNAs in various cancers. It is implemented in R and is freely available at http://tagcna.sourceforge.net/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 30%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Other 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 30%
Computer Science 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%