↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Do Chimpanzees Use Weight to Select Hammer Tools?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Do Chimpanzees Use Weight to Select Hammer Tools?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelia Schrauf, Josep Call, Koki Fuwa, Satoshi Hirata

Abstract

The extent to which tool-using animals take into account relevant task parameters is poorly understood. Nut cracking is one of the most complex forms of tool use, the choice of an adequate hammer being a critical aspect in success. Several properties make a hammer suitable for nut cracking, with weight being a key factor in determining the impact of a strike; in general, the greater the weight the fewer strikes required. This study experimentally investigated whether chimpanzees are able to encode the relevance of weight as a property of hammers to crack open nuts. By presenting chimpanzees with three hammers that differed solely in weight, we assessed their ability to relate the weight of the different tools with their effectiveness and thus select the most effective one(s). Our results show that chimpanzees use weight alone in selecting tools to crack open nuts and that experience clearly affects the subjects' attentiveness to the tool properties that are relevant for the task at hand. Chimpanzees can encode the requirements that a nut-cracking tool should meet (in terms of weight) to be effective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Thailand 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Other 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 36%
Psychology 11 22%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%