↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Teamwork: Improved eQTL Mapping Using Combinations of Machine Learning Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Teamwork: Improved eQTL Mapping Using Combinations of Machine Learning Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marit Ackermann, Mathieu Clément-Ziza, Jacob J. Michaelson, Andreas Beyer

Abstract

Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping is a widely used technique to uncover regulatory relationships between genes. A range of methodologies have been developed to map links between expression traits and genotypes. The DREAM (Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods) initiative is a community project to objectively assess the relative performance of different computational approaches for solving specific systems biology problems. The goal of one of the DREAM5 challenges was to reverse-engineer genetic interaction networks from synthetic genetic variation and gene expression data, which simulates the problem of eQTL mapping. In this framework, we proposed an approach whose originality resides in the use of a combination of existing machine learning algorithms (committee). Although it was not the best performer, this method was by far the most precise on average. After the competition, we continued in this direction by evaluating other committees using the DREAM5 data and developed a method that relies on Random Forests and LASSO. It achieved a much higher average precision than the DREAM best performer at the cost of slightly lower average sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 63 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Computer Science 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 10 14%