↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Automated Cell Identification and Tracking Using Nanoparticle Moving-Light-Displays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Automated Cell Identification and Tracking Using Nanoparticle Moving-Light-Displays
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040835
Pubmed ID
Authors

James A. Tonkin, Paul Rees, Martyn R. Brown, Rachel J. Errington, Paul J. Smith, Sally C. Chappell, Huw D. Summers

Abstract

An automated technique for the identification, tracking and analysis of biological cells is presented. It is based on the use of nanoparticles, enclosed within intra-cellular vesicles, to produce clusters of discrete, point-like fluorescent, light sources within the cells. Computational analysis of these light ensembles in successive time frames of a movie sequence, using k-means clustering and particle tracking algorithms, provides robust and automated discrimination of live cells and their motion and a quantitative measure of their proliferation. This approach is a cytometric version of the moving light display technique which is widely used for analyzing the biological motion of humans and animals. We use the endocytosis of CdTe/ZnS, core-shell quantum dots to produce the light displays within an A549, epithelial, lung cancer cell line, using time-lapse imaging with frame acquisition every 5 minutes over a 40 hour time period. The nanoparticle moving light displays provide simultaneous collection of cell motility data, resolution of mitotic traversal dynamics and identification of familial relationships allowing construction of multi-parameter lineage trees.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Unspecified 8 22%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Engineering 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 4 11%