↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Integrated Metabolo-Proteomic Approach to Decipher the Mechanisms by Which Wheat QTL (Fhb1) Contributes to Resistance against Fusarium graminearum

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Integrated Metabolo-Proteomic Approach to Decipher the Mechanisms by Which Wheat QTL (Fhb1) Contributes to Resistance against Fusarium graminearum
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raghavendra Gunnaiah, Ajjamada C. Kushalappa, Raj Duggavathi, Stephen Fox, Daryl J. Somers

Abstract

Resistance in plants to pathogen attack can be qualitative or quantitative. For the latter, hundreds of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have been identified, but the mechanisms of resistance are largely unknown. Integrated non-target metabolomics and proteomics, using high resolution hybrid mass spectrometry, were applied to identify the mechanisms of resistance governed by the fusarium head blight resistance locus, Fhb1, in the near isogenic lines derived from wheat genotype Nyubai.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 219 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 26%
Researcher 54 23%
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 12%
Chemistry 11 5%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Chemical Engineering 2 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 39 17%