↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Do Children Solve Aesop's Fable?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
How Do Children Solve Aesop's Fable?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy G. Cheke, Elsa Loissel, Nicola S. Clayton

Abstract

Studies on members of the crow family using the "Aesop's Fable" paradigm have revealed remarkable abilities in these birds, and suggested a mechanism by which associative learning and folk physics may interact when learning new problems. In the present study, children between 4 and 10 years of age were tested on the same tasks as the birds. Overall the performance of the children between 5-7-years was similar to that of the birds, while children from 8-years were able to succeed in all tasks from the first trial. However the pattern of performance across tasks suggested that different learning mechanisms might be being employed by children than by adult birds. Specifically, it is possible that in children, unlike corvids, performance is not affected by counter-intuitive mechanism cues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 76 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 14 17%