↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

It’s Not Just Lunch: Extra-Pair Commensality Can Trigger Sexual Jealousy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
48 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
It’s Not Just Lunch: Extra-Pair Commensality Can Trigger Sexual Jealousy
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin M. Kniffin, Brian Wansink

Abstract

Do people believe that sharing food might involve sharing more than just food? To investigate this, participants were asked to rate how jealous they (Study 1)--or their best friend (Study 2)--would be if their current romantic partner were contacted by an ex-romantic partner and subsequently engaged in an array of food- and drink-based activities. We consistently find--across both men and women--that meals elicit more jealousy than face-to-face interactions that do not involve eating, such as having coffee. These findings suggest that people generally presume that sharing a meal enhances cooperation. In the context of romantic pairs, we find that participants are attuned to relationship risks that extra-pair commensality can present. For romantic partners left out of a meal, we find a common view that lunch, for example, is not "just lunch."

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 6 11%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 11 20%