↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Limitations of the Human Reference Genome for Personalized Genomics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
53 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Limitations of the Human Reference Genome for Personalized Genomics
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey A. Rosenfeld, Christopher E. Mason, Todd M. Smith

Abstract

Data from the 1000 genomes project (1KGP) and Complete Genomics (CG) have dramatically increased the numbers of known genetic variants and challenge several assumptions about the reference genome and its uses in both clinical and research settings. Specifically, 34% of published array-based GWAS studies for a variety of diseases utilize probes that overlap unanticipated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), indels, or structural variants. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) block length depends on the numbers of markers used, and the mean LD block size decreases from 16 kb to 7 kb,when HapMap-based calculations are compared to blocks computed from1KGP data. Additionally, when 1KGP and CG variants are compared, 19% of the single nucleotide variants (SNVs) reported from common genomes are unique to one dataset; likely a result of differences in data collection methodology, alignment of reads to the reference genome, and variant-calling algorithms. Together these observations indicate that current research resources and informatics methods do not adequately account for the high level of variation that already exists in the human population and significant efforts are needed to create resources that can accurately assess personal genomics for health, disease, and predict treatment outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 180 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Other 18 9%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Computer Science 9 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 23 11%