↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Systematic Review Investigating Healthy Lifestyle Interventions Incorporating Goal Setting Strategies for Preventing Excess Gestational Weight Gain

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review Investigating Healthy Lifestyle Interventions Incorporating Goal Setting Strategies for Preventing Excess Gestational Weight Gain
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Jane Brown, Marlene Sinclair, Dianne Liddle, Alyson J. Hill, Elaine Madden, Janine Stockdale

Abstract

Excess gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important risk factor for long term obesity in women. However, current interventions aimed at preventing excess GWG appear to have a limited effect. Several studies have highlighted the importance of linking theory with empirical evidence for producing effective interventions for behaviour change. Theorists have demonstrated that goals can be an important source of human motivation and goal setting has shown promise in promoting diet and physical activity behaviour change within non-pregnant individuals. The use of goal setting as a behaviour change strategy has been systematically evaluated within overweight and obese individuals, yet its use within pregnancy has not yet been systematically explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 19%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Psychology 20 10%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 36 18%