↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Simulation vs. Reality: A Comparison of In Silico Distance Predictions with DEER and FRET Measurements

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Simulation vs. Reality: A Comparison of In Silico Distance Predictions with DEER and FRET Measurements
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Klose, Johann P. Klare, Dina Grohmann, Christopher W. M. Kay, Finn Werner, Heinz-Jürgen Steinhoff

Abstract

Site specific incorporation of molecular probes such as fluorescent- and nitroxide spin-labels into biomolecules, and subsequent analysis by Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and double electron-electron resonance (DEER) can elucidate the distance and distance-changes between the probes. However, the probes have an intrinsic conformational flexibility due to the linker by which they are conjugated to the biomolecule. This property minimizes the influence of the label side chain on the structure of the target molecule, but complicates the direct correlation of the experimental inter-label distances with the macromolecular structure or changes thereof. Simulation methods that account for the conformational flexibility and orientation of the probe(s) can be helpful in overcoming this problem. We performed distance measurements using FRET and DEER and explored different simulation techniques to predict inter-label distances using the Rpo4/7 stalk module of the M. jannaschii RNA polymerase. This is a suitable model system because it is rigid and a high-resolution X-ray structure is available. The conformations of the fluorescent labels and nitroxide spin labels on Rpo4/7 were modeled using in vacuo molecular dynamics simulations (MD) and a stochastic Monte Carlo sampling approach. For the nitroxide probes we also performed MD simulations with explicit water and carried out a rotamer library analysis. Our results show that the Monte Carlo simulations are in better agreement with experiments than the MD simulations and the rotamer library approach results in plausible distance predictions. Because the latter is the least computationally demanding of the methods we have explored, and is readily available to many researchers, it prevails as the method of choice for the interpretation of DEER distance distributions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 28%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 29%
Chemistry 16 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 21%
Computer Science 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 17%