Title |
Analyzing Taphonomic Deformation of Ankylosaur Skulls Using Retrodeformation and Finite Element Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0039323 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victoria M. Arbour, Philip J. Currie |
Abstract |
Taphonomic deformation can make the interpretation of vertebrate fossil morphology difficult. The effects of taphonomic deformation are investigated in two ankylosaurid dinosaur taxa, Euoplocephalus tutus (to investigate effects on our understanding of intraspecific variation) and Minotaurasaurus ramachandrani (to investigate the validity of this genus). The ratio of orbit maximum rostrocaudal length to perpendicular height is used as a strain ellipse, which can be used to determine if ankylosaur skull fossils have been dorsoventrally compacted during fossilization and diagenesis. The software program Geomagic is used to retrodeform three-dimensional (3D) digital models of the ankylosaur skulls. The effects of sediment compaction are modeled using finite element analysis, and the resulting strain distributions are compared with the retrodeformed models as a test of the retrodeformation method. Taphonomic deformation can account for a large amount of intraspecific variation in Euoplocephalus, but finite element analysis and retrodeformation of Minotaurasaurus shows that many of its diagnostic features are unlikely to result from deformation. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 18% |
Canada | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 68% |
Scientists | 7 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |