↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Evaluation of 16S rDNA-Based Community Profiling for Human Microbiome Research

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
662 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
Evaluation of 16S rDNA-Based Community Profiling for Human Microbiome Research
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jumpstart Consortium Human Microbiome Project Data Generation Working Group

Abstract

The Human Microbiome Project will establish a reference data set for analysis of the microbiome of healthy adults by surveying multiple body sites from 300 people and generating data from over 12,000 samples. To characterize these samples, the participating sequencing centers evaluated and adopted 16S rDNA community profiling protocols for ABI 3730 and 454 FLX Titanium sequencing. In the course of establishing protocols, we examined the performance and error characteristics of each technology, and the relationship of sequence error to the utility of 16S rDNA regions for classification- and OTU-based analysis of community structure. The data production protocols used for this work are those used by the participating centers to produce 16S rDNA sequence for the Human Microbiome Project. Thus, these results can be informative for interpreting the large body of clinical 16S rDNA data produced for this project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 662 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 4%
Canada 7 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 598 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 164 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 24%
Student > Master 82 12%
Student > Bachelor 49 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 5%
Other 115 17%
Unknown 59 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 336 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 34 5%
Environmental Science 24 4%
Other 56 8%
Unknown 80 12%