↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Fact or Factitious? A Psychobiological Study of Authentic and Simulated Dissociative Identity States

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Fact or Factitious? A Psychobiological Study of Authentic and Simulated Dissociative Identity States
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039279
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. A. T. Simone Reinders, Antoon T. M. Willemsen, Herry P. J. Vos, Johan A. den Boer, Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis

Abstract

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a disputed psychiatric disorder. Research findings and clinical observations suggest that DID involves an authentic mental disorder related to factors such as traumatization and disrupted attachment. A competing view indicates that DID is due to fantasy proneness, suggestibility, suggestion, and role-playing. Here we examine whether dissociative identity state-dependent psychobiological features in DID can be induced in high or low fantasy prone individuals by instructed and motivated role-playing, and suggestion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 278 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 111 39%
Student > Master 36 13%
Other 20 7%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 167 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 9%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 52 18%