↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Metabolic Effects of n-3 PUFA as Phospholipids Are Superior to Triglycerides in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet: Possible Role of Endocannabinoids

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic Effects of n-3 PUFA as Phospholipids Are Superior to Triglycerides in Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet: Possible Role of Endocannabinoids
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038834
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Rossmeisl, Zuzana Macek Jilkova, Ondrej Kuda, Tomas Jelenik, Dasa Medrikova, Barbora Stankova, Björn Kristinsson, Gudmundur G. Haraldsson, Harald Svensen, Iren Stoknes, Peter Sjövall, Ylva Magnusson, Michiel G. J. Balvers, Kitty C. M. Verhoeckx, Eva Tvrzicka, Morten Bryhn, Jan Kopecky

Abstract

n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, namely docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and can ameliorate many of obesity-associated disorders. We hypothesised that the latter effect will be more pronounced when DHA/EPA is supplemented as phospholipids rather than as triglycerides.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 179 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 46 25%