↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Theories of Willpower Affect Sustained Learning

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Theories of Willpower Affect Sustained Learning
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric M. Miller, Gregory M. Walton, Carol S. Dweck, Veronika Job, Kali H. Trzesniewski, Samuel M. McClure

Abstract

Building cognitive abilities often requires sustained engagement with effortful tasks. We demonstrate that beliefs about willpower-whether willpower is viewed as a limited or non-limited resource-impact sustained learning on a strenuous mental task. As predicted, beliefs about willpower did not affect accuracy or improvement during the initial phases of learning; however, participants who were led to view willpower as non-limited showed greater sustained learning over the full duration of the task. These findings highlight the interactive nature of motivational and cognitive processes: motivational factors can substantially affect people's ability to recruit their cognitive resources to sustain learning over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 184 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 37 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 47 24%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 45%
Social Sciences 30 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 33 17%