↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Consensus Rules in Variant Detection from Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Consensus Rules in Variant Detection from Next-Generation Sequencing Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peilin Jia, Fei Li, Jufeng Xia, Haiquan Chen, Hongbin Ji, William Pao, Zhongming Zhao

Abstract

A critical step in detecting variants from next-generation sequencing data is post hoc filtering of putative variants called or predicted by computational tools. Here, we highlight four critical parameters that could enhance the accuracy of called single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions: quality and deepness, refinement and improvement of initial mapping, allele/strand balance, and examination of spurious genes. Use of these sequence features appropriately in variant filtering could greatly improve validation rates, thereby saving time and costs in next-generation sequencing projects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 165 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 18 10%
Other 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 15 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Computer Science 13 7%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 20 11%