↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

From Sensor Data to Animal Behaviour: An Oystercatcher Example

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
From Sensor Data to Animal Behaviour: An Oystercatcher Example
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037997
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Roeland Bom, E. Emiel van Loon, Bruno J. Ens, Kees Oosterbeek, Willem Bouten

Abstract

Animal-borne sensors enable researchers to remotely track animals, their physiological state and body movements. Accelerometers, for example, have been used in several studies to measure body movement, posture, and energy expenditure, although predominantly in marine animals. In many studies, behaviour is often inferred from expert interpretation of sensor data and not validated with direct observations of the animal. The aim of this study was to derive models that could be used to classify oystercatcher (Haematopus ostralegus) behaviour based on sensor data. We measured the location, speed, and tri-axial acceleration of three oystercatchers using a flexible GPS tracking system and conducted simultaneous visual observations of the behaviour of these birds in their natural environment. We then used these data to develop three supervised classification trees of behaviour and finally applied one of the models to calculate time-activity budgets. The model based on accelerometer data developed to classify three behaviours (fly, terrestrial locomotion, and no movement) was much more accurate (cross-validation error = 0.14) than the model based on GPS-speed alone (cross-validation error = 0.35). The most parsimonious acceleration model designed to classify eight behaviours could distinguish five: fly, forage, body care, stand, and sit (cross-validation error = 0.28); other behaviours that were observed, such as aggression or handling of prey, could not be distinguished. Model limitations and potential improvements are discussed. The workflow design presented in this study can facilitate model development, be adapted to a wide range of species, and together with the appropriate measurements, can foster the study of behaviour and habitat use of free living animals throughout their annual routine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 350 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 24%
Student > Master 75 20%
Researcher 61 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 9%
Other 18 5%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 56 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 50%
Environmental Science 62 16%
Computer Science 11 3%
Engineering 11 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 75 20%