↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Small Molecules with Similar Structures Exhibit Agonist, Neutral Antagonist or Inverse Agonist Activity toward Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Small Molecules with Similar Structures Exhibit Agonist, Neutral Antagonist or Inverse Agonist Activity toward Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin-ichiro Miura, Yoshihiro Kiya, Hiroyuki Hanzawa, Naoki Nakao, Masahiro Fujino, Satoshi Imaizumi, Yoshino Matsuo, Hiroaki Yanagisawa, Hiroyuki Koike, Issei Komuro, Sadashiva S. Karnik, Keijiro Saku

Abstract

Small differences in the chemical structures of ligands can be responsible for agonism, neutral antagonism or inverse agonism toward a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Although each ligand may stabilize the receptor conformation in a different way, little is known about the precise conformational differences. We synthesized the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan, R239470 and R794847, which induced inverse agonism, antagonism and agonism, respectively, and then investigated the ligand-specific changes in the receptor conformation with respect to stabilization around transmembrane (TM)3. The results of substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies support the novel concept that ligand-induced changes in the conformation of TM3 play a role in stabilizing GPCR. Although the agonist-, neutral antagonist and inverse agonist-binding sites in the AT(1) receptor are similar, each ligand induced specific conformational changes in TM3. In addition, all of the experimental data were obtained with functional receptors in a native membrane environment (in situ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Psychology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%