↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Is the Self Always Better than a Friend? Self-Face Recognition in Christians and Atheists

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Is the Self Always Better than a Friend? Self-Face Recognition in Christians and Atheists
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037824
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yina Ma, Shihui Han

Abstract

Early behavioral studies found that human adults responded faster to their own faces than faces of familiar others or strangers, a finding referred to as self-face advantage. Recent research suggests that the self-face advantage is mediated by implicit positive association with the self and is influenced by sociocultural experience. The current study investigated whether and how Christian belief and practice affect the processing of self-face in a Chinese population. Christian and Atheist participants were recruited for an implicit association test (IAT) in Experiment 1 and a face-owner identification task in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 found that atheists responded faster to self-face when it shared the same response key with positive compared to negative trait adjectives. This IAT effect, however, was significantly reduced in Christians. Experiment 2 found that atheists responded faster to self-face compared to a friend's face, but this self-face advantage was significantly reduced in Christians. Hierarchical regression analyses further showed that the IAT effect positively predicted self-face advantage in atheists but not in Christians. Our findings suggest that Christian belief and practice may weaken implicit positive association with the self and thus decrease the advantage of the self over a friend during face recognition in the believers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 15 30%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Computer Science 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 12%