↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Development and Validation of Burkholderia pseudomallei-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays for Clinical, Environmental or Forensic Detection Applications

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Development and Validation of Burkholderia pseudomallei-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays for Clinical, Environmental or Forensic Detection Applications
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037723
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin P. Price, Julia L. Dale, James M. Cook, Derek S. Sarovich, Meagan L. Seymour, Jennifer L. Ginther, Emily L. Kaufman, Stephen M. Beckstrom-Sternberg, Mark Mayo, Mirjam Kaestli, Mindy B. Glass, Jay E. Gee, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Jeffrey M. Warner, Anthony Baker, Jeffrey T. Foster, Patrick Tan, Apichai Tuanyok, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Sharon J. Peacock, Bart J. Currie, David M. Wagner, Paul Keim, Talima Pearson

Abstract

The bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei causes melioidosis, a rare but serious illness that can be fatal if untreated or misdiagnosed. Species-specific PCR assays provide a technically simple method for differentiating B. pseudomallei from near-neighbor species. However, substantial genetic diversity and high levels of recombination within this species reduce the likelihood that molecular signatures will differentiate all B. pseudomallei from other Burkholderiaceae. Currently available molecular assays for B. pseudomallei detection lack rigorous validation across large in silico datasets and isolate collections to test for specificity, and none have been subjected to stringent quality control criteria (accuracy, precision, selectivity, limit of quantitation (LoQ), limit of detection (LoD), linearity, ruggedness and robustness) to determine their suitability for environmental, clinical or forensic investigations. In this study, we developed two novel B. pseudomallei specific assays, 122018 and 266152, using a dual-probe approach to differentiate B. pseudomallei from B. thailandensis, B. oklahomensis and B. thailandensis-like species; other species failed to amplify. Species specificity was validated across a large DNA panel (>2,300 samples) comprising Burkholderia spp. and non-Burkholderia bacterial and fungal species of clinical and environmental relevance. Comparison of assay specificity to two previously published B. pseudomallei-specific assays, BurkDiff and TTS1, demonstrated comparable performance of all assays, providing between 99.7 and 100% specificity against our isolate panel. Last, we subjected 122018 and 266152 to rigorous quality control analyses, thus providing quantitative limits of assay performance. Using B. pseudomallei as a model, our study provides a framework for comprehensive quantitative validation of molecular assays and provides additional, highly validated B. pseudomallei assays for the scientific research community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 73 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%