↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Mine, Yours, Ours? Sharing Data on Human Genetic Variation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Mine, Yours, Ours? Sharing Data on Human Genetic Variation
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Milia, Alessandra Congiu, Paolo Anagnostou, Francesco Montinaro, Marco Capocasa, Emanuele Sanna, Giovanni Destro Bisol

Abstract

The achievement of a robust, effective and responsible form of data sharing is currently regarded as a priority for biological and bio-medical research. Empirical evaluations of data sharing may be regarded as an indispensable first step in the identification of critical aspects and the development of strategies aimed at increasing availability of research data for the scientific community as a whole. Research concerning human genetic variation represents a potential forerunner in the establishment of widespread sharing of primary datasets. However, no specific analysis has been conducted to date in order to ascertain whether the sharing of primary datasets is common-practice in this research field. To this aim, we analyzed a total of 543 mitochondrial and Y chromosomal datasets reported in 508 papers indexed in the Pubmed database from 2008 to 2011. A substantial portion of datasets (21.9%) was found to have been withheld, while neither strong editorial policies nor high impact factor proved to be effective in increasing the sharing rate beyond the current figure of 80.5%. Disaggregating datasets for research fields, we could observe a substantially lower sharing in medical than evolutionary and forensic genetics, more evident for whole mtDNA sequences (15.0% vs 99.6%). The low rate of positive responses to e-mail requests sent to corresponding authors of withheld datasets (28.6%) suggests that sharing should be regarded as a prerequisite for final paper acceptance, while making authors deposit their results in open online databases which provide data quality control seems to provide the best-practice standard. Finally, we estimated that 29.8% to 32.9% of total resources are used to generate withheld datasets, implying that an important portion of research funding does not produce shared knowledge. By making the scientific community and the public aware of this important aspect, we may help popularize a more effective culture of data sharing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 7%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 68 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 9 11%
Librarian 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 24%
Computer Science 15 18%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 13 16%