↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Millipede Taxonomy after 250 Years: Classification and Taxonomic Practices in a Mega-Diverse yet Understudied Arthropod Group

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
33 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Millipede Taxonomy after 250 Years: Classification and Taxonomic Practices in a Mega-Diverse yet Understudied Arthropod Group
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Brewer, Petra Sierwald, Jason E. Bond

Abstract

The arthropod class Diplopoda is a mega-diverse group comprising >12,000 described millipede species. The history of taxonomic research within the group is tumultuous and, consequently, has yielded a questionable higher-level classification. Few higher-taxa are defined using synapomorphies, and the practice of single taxon descriptions lacking a revisionary framework has produced many monotypic taxa. Additionally, taxonomic and geographic biases render global species diversity estimations unreliable. We test whether the ordinal taxa of the Diplopoda are consistent with regards to underlying taxonomic diversity, attempt to provide estimates for global species diversity, and examine millipede taxonomic effort at a global geographic scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 79 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 19%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 17 20%