↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

In Vivo Effects Of Traditional Ayurvedic Formulations in Drosophila melanogaster Model Relate with Therapeutic Applications

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
In Vivo Effects Of Traditional Ayurvedic Formulations in Drosophila melanogaster Model Relate with Therapeutic Applications
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vibha Dwivedi, E. M. Anandan, Rajesh S. Mony, T. S. Muraleedharan, M. S. Valiathan, Mousumi Mutsuddi, Subhash C. Lakhotia

Abstract

Ayurveda represents the traditional medicine system of India. Since mechanistic details of therapy in terms of current biology are not available in Ayurvedic literature, modern scientific studies are necessary to understand its major concepts and procedures. It is necessary to examine effects of the whole Ayurvedic formulations rather than their "active" components as is done in most current studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 97 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 29%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 8%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 34 33%