↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Conserving Critical Sites for Biodiversity Provides Disproportionate Benefits to People

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
Title
Conserving Critical Sites for Biodiversity Provides Disproportionate Benefits to People
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank W. Larsen, Will R. Turner, Thomas M. Brooks

Abstract

Protecting natural habitats in priority areas is essential to halt the loss of biodiversity. Yet whether these benefits for biodiversity also yield benefits for human well-being remains controversial. Here we assess the potential human well-being benefits of safeguarding a global network of sites identified as top priorities for the conservation of threatened species. Conserving these sites would yield benefits--in terms of a) climate change mitigation through avoidance of CO(2) emissions from deforestation; b) freshwater services to downstream human populations; c) retention of option value; and d) benefits to maintenance of human cultural diversity--significantly exceeding those anticipated from randomly selected sites within the same countries and ecoregions. Results suggest that safeguarding sites important for biodiversity conservation provides substantial benefits to human well-being.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 239 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 16%
Student > Master 35 13%
Other 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 38%
Environmental Science 85 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 45 17%