↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Fall Classification by Machine Learning Using Mobile Phones

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
Title
Fall Classification by Machine Learning Using Mobile Phones
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark V. Albert, Konrad Kording, Megan Herrmann, Arun Jayaraman

Abstract

Fall prevention is a critical component of health care; falls are a common source of injury in the elderly and are associated with significant levels of mortality and morbidity. Automatically detecting falls can allow rapid response to potential emergencies; in addition, knowing the cause or manner of a fall can be beneficial for prevention studies or a more tailored emergency response. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate techniques to not only reliably detect a fall but also to automatically classify the type. We asked 15 subjects to simulate four different types of falls-left and right lateral, forward trips, and backward slips-while wearing mobile phones and previously validated, dedicated accelerometers. Nine subjects also wore the devices for ten days, to provide data for comparison with the simulated falls. We applied five machine learning classifiers to a large time-series feature set to detect falls. Support vector machines and regularized logistic regression were able to identify a fall with 98% accuracy and classify the type of fall with 99% accuracy. This work demonstrates how current machine learning approaches can simplify data collection for prevention in fall-related research as well as improve rapid response to potential injuries due to falls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 225 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 68 29%
Engineering 52 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 59 25%