↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Misperceptions in the Trajectories of Objects undergoing Curvilinear Motion

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Misperceptions in the Trajectories of Objects undergoing Curvilinear Motion
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ozgur Yilmaz, Srimant P. Tripathy, Haluk Ogmen

Abstract

Trajectory perception is crucial in scene understanding and action. A variety of trajectory misperceptions have been reported in the literature. In this study, we quantify earlier observations that reported distortions in the perceived shape of bilinear trajectories and in the perceived positions of their deviation. Our results show that bilinear trajectories with deviation angles smaller than 90 deg are perceived smoothed while those with deviation angles larger than 90 degrees are perceived sharpened. The sharpening effect is weaker in magnitude than the smoothing effect. We also found a correlation between the distortion of perceived trajectories and the perceived shift of their deviation point. Finally, using a dual-task paradigm, we found that reducing attentional resources allocated to the moving target causes an increase in the perceived shift of the deviation point of the trajectory. We interpret these results in the context of interactions between motion and position systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Belgium 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Luxembourg 1 6%
Unknown 13 72%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Bachelor 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 33%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 2 11%