↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Effect of Age on Variability in the Production of Text-Based Global Inferences

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Age on Variability in the Production of Text-Based Global Inferences
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0036161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynne J. Williams, Joseph P. Dunlop, Hervé Abdi

Abstract

As we age, our differences in cognitive skills become more visible, an effect especially true for memory and problem solving skills (i.e., fluid intelligence). However, by contrast with fluid intelligence, few studies have examined variability in measures that rely on one's world knowledge (i.e., crystallized intelligence). The current study investigated whether age increased the variability in text based global inference generation--a measure of crystallized intelligence. Global inference generation requires the integration of textual information and world knowledge and can be expressed as a gist or lesson. Variability in generating two global inferences for a single text was examined in young-old (62 to 69 years), middle-old (70 to 76 years) and old-old (77 to 94 years) adults. The older two groups showed greater variability, with the middle elderly group being most variable. These findings suggest that variability may be a characteristic of both fluid and crystallized intelligence in aging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 33%
Neuroscience 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%