↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Antibodies for Assessing Circadian Clock Proteins in the Rodent Suprachiasmatic Nucleus

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Antibodies for Assessing Circadian Clock Proteins in the Rodent Suprachiasmatic Nucleus
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph LeSauter, Christopher M. Lambert, Margaret R. Robotham, Zina Model, Rae Silver, David R. Weaver

Abstract

Research on the mechanisms underlying circadian rhythmicity and the response of brain and body clocks to environmental and physiological challenges requires assessing levels of circadian clock proteins. Too often, however, it is difficult to acquire antibodies that specifically and reliably label these proteins. Many of these antibodies also lack appropriate validation. The goal of this project was to generate and characterize antibodies against several circadian clock proteins. We examined mice and hamsters at peak and trough times of clock protein expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). In addition, we confirmed specificity by testing the antibodies on mice with targeted disruption of the relevant genes. Our results identify antibodies against PER1, PER2, BMAL1 and CLOCK that are useful for assessing circadian clock proteins in the SCN by immunocytochemistry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 40%
Neuroscience 16 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 16 18%