↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Number Concepts without Number Lines in an Indigenous Group of Papua New Guinea

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
22 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Number Concepts without Number Lines in an Indigenous Group of Papua New Guinea
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035662
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Núñez, Kensy Cooperrider, Jürg Wassmann

Abstract

The generic concept of number line, which maps numbers to unidimensional space, is a fundamental concept in mathematics, but its cognitive origins are uncertain. Two defining criteria of the number line are that (i) there is a mapping of each individual number (or numerosity) under consideration onto a specific location on the line, and (ii) that the mapping defines a unidimensional space representing numbers with a metric--a distance function. It has been proposed that the number line is based on a spontaneous universal human intuition, rooted directly in brain evolution, that maps number magnitude to linear space with a metric. To date, no culture lacking this intuition has been documented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 42%
Social Sciences 21 19%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Linguistics 5 4%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 15 13%