↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Do Women Prefer More Complex Music around Ovulation?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Do Women Prefer More Complex Music around Ovulation?
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin D. Charlton, Piera Filippi, W. Tecumseh Fitch

Abstract

The evolutionary origins of music are much debated. One theory holds that the ability to produce complex musical sounds might reflect qualities that are relevant in mate choice contexts and hence, that music is functionally analogous to the sexually-selected acoustic displays of some animals. If so, women may be expected to show heightened preferences for more complex music when they are most fertile. Here, we used computer-generated musical pieces and ovulation predictor kits to test this hypothesis. Our results indicate that women prefer more complex music in general; however, we found no evidence that their preference for more complex music increased around ovulation. Consequently, our findings are not consistent with the hypothesis that a heightened preference/bias in women for more complex music around ovulation could have played a role in the evolution of music. We go on to suggest future studies that could further investigate whether sexual selection played a role in the evolution of this universal aspect of human culture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 2 3%
Sweden 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 63 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Arts and Humanities 6 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 4 5%