↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Automated Phenotype Recognition for Zebrafish Embryo Based In Vivo High Throughput Toxicity Screening of Engineered Nano-Materials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Automated Phenotype Recognition for Zebrafish Embryo Based In Vivo High Throughput Toxicity Screening of Engineered Nano-Materials
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0035014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rong Liu, Sijie Lin, Robert Rallo, Yan Zhao, Robert Damoiseaux, Tian Xia, Shuo Lin, Andre Nel, Yoram Cohen

Abstract

A phenotype recognition model was developed for high throughput screening (HTS) of engineered Nano-Materials (eNMs) toxicity using zebrafish embryo developmental response classified, from automatically captured images and without manual manipulation of zebrafish positioning, by three basic phenotypes (i.e., hatched, unhatched, and dead). The recognition model was built with a set of vectorial descriptors providing image color and texture information. The best performing model was attained with three image descriptors (color histogram, representative color, and color layout) identified as most suitable from an initial pool of six descriptors. This model had an average recognition accuracy of 97.40±0.95% in a 10-fold cross-validation and 93.75% in a stress test of low quality zebrafish images. The present work has shown that a phenotyping model can be developed with accurate recognition ability suitable for zebrafish-based HTS assays. Although the present methodology was successfully demonstrated for only three basic zebrafish embryonic phenotypes, it can be readily adapted to incorporate more subtle phenotypes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Engineering 10 9%
Computer Science 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 21 19%